电离辐射诱发癌症的线性无阈模型研究动态

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电离辐射诱发癌症的线性无阈模型(LNT)是国际社会核与辐射防护监管的基础及依据。然而,近年来,LNT风险模型的有效性越来越受到质疑,且认为基于LNT的法规体系给社会带来了过度的成本。本文通过对近期国际社会有关LNT文献研读,以探讨LNT发展动向及进一步研究方向,为国内相关领域工作开展提供借鉴。

关键词: 电离辐射, 癌症, 线性无阈, 研究动态

Abstract: The linear non threshold (LNT) model for cancer induced by ionizing radiation is the Foundation and basis of nuclear and radiation protection supervision. However, in recent years, the validity of LNT risk model has been questioned more and more. It is considered that the LNT based regulatory system has brought excessive cost to the society. In this paper, the recent international literature on LNT is studied to explore the development trend and further research direction of LNT, so as to provide reference for the domestic work in related fields.

Key words: radiation, the linear non threshold, challenge, research direction

中图分类号:

TL71

刘晓明, 武晓燕, 马跃峰, 张艳娜, 薛向明, 古晓娜, 战景明, 刘占旗, 边林秀. 电离辐射诱发癌症的线性无阈模型研究动态[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(6): 518-524.

LIU Xiaoming, WU Xiaoyan, MA Yuefeng, ZHANG Yanna, XUE Xiangming, GU Xiaona, ZHAN Jingming, LIU Zhanqi, BIAN Linxiu. The research trends of linear non threshold hypothesis on cancer induced by ionizing radiation[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2022, 42(6): 518-524.

参考文献

[1] Yanovskiy M,Shaki Y Y,Socol Y. Ethics of adoption and use of the linear no-threshold model[J]. Dose Response, 2019, 17(1): 1-3.
[2] National Research Council (NRC). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—Phase 2[M]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006: 424. ISBN: 0-309-53040-7 .
[3] Boice J D Jr. The linear non threshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2017, 93(10):1079-1092.
[4] Costantini D,Borremans B.The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis based models: An evolutionary perspective[J]. Chem Biol Interact, 2019,301:26-33.
[5] Calabrese E J, Hanekamp J C, Shamoun D Y, et al. The EPA cancer risk assessment default model proposal: moving away from the LNT[J]. Dose Response, 2018, 16(3):1-4.
[6] Vaiserman A M. Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment[J]. Dose Response, 2010, 8(2): 172-191.
[7] Seong K M, Seo S, Lee D, et al. Is the linear no-threshold dose-response paradigm still necessary for the assessment of health effects of low dose radiation?[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2016, 31: S10-23.
[8] Anonymous. Genetic effects of atomic radiation[J]. Science, 1956,123:1157-1164.
[9] NCRP. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear non-threshold model[R]. NCRP Commentary 27,Bethesda, MD: NCRP,2018.
[10] Ulsh B A. A critical evaluation of the NCRP commentary 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects[J].Environ Res, 2018,167:472-487.
[11] Socol Y. Reconsidering health consequences of the Chernobyl accident[J]. Dose Response, 2015,13(1):1-10.
[12] Socol Y, Dobrzynski L. Atomic bomb survivors life-span study: insufficient statistical power to select radiation carcinogenesis model[J]. Dose Response, 2015, 13(1): 1-17.
[13] Grant E J, Brenner A V, Sugiyama H, et al. Solid cancer incidence among the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958—2009[J]. Radiation Research, 2017, 187(5): 513-537.
[14] Vaiserman A M, Koliada A, Zabuga O, et al. Health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation: current scientific debates and regulatory issues[J]. Dose Response, 2018, 16(3):1-27.
[15] Sutou S. Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model[J]. Genes Environ, 2020,42:1-11.
[16] Siegel J A,Brooks A L,Fisher D R, et al. A critical assessment of the linear no-threshold hypothesis: its validity and applicability for use in risk assessment and radiation protection[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2019,44(7):521-525.
[17] Men T, Brennan P, Boffetta P, et al. Russian mortality trends for 1991—2001: analysis by cause and region[J]. BMJ, 2003,327(7421):964.
[18] Ivanov V K. Late cancer and noncancer risks among Chernobyl emergency workers of Russia[J]. Health Phys,2007,93(5):470-479.
[19] Brenner D J, Doll R, Goodhead D T, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A, 2003,100 (24) :13761-13766.
[20] Tharmalingam S,Sreetharan S,Brooks A L, et al. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies[J]. Chem Biol Interact, 2019, 301:54-67.
[21] Blimkie M S, Fung L C, Petoukhov E S, et al. Repair of DNA double-strand breaks is not modulated by low-dose gamma radiation in C57BL/6 mice[J]. Radiat Res, 2014,181 (5): 548-559.
[22] Park H S, Seong K M, Kim J Y, et al. Chronic low-dose radiation inhibits the cells death by cytotoxic high-dose radiation increasing the level of AKT and acinus proteins via NF-kappaB activation[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2013,89 (5): 371-377.
[23] Azzam E I, Raaphorst G P, Mitchel R E, et al. Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells[J]. Radiat Res, 1994,138 (Suppl 1) : S28-S31.
[24] Koturbash I, Merrifield M, Kovalchuk O. Fractionated exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation results in accumulation of DNA damage in mouse spleen tissue and activation of apoptosis in a p53/Atm-independent manner [J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2017,93 (2): 148-155.
[25] Wong R S. Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment[J]. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 2011, 30(1): 87-87.
[26] Barazzuol L, Jeggo P A. In vivo sensitivity of the embryonic and adult neural stem cell compartments to low-dose radiation[J]. Journal of Radiation Research, 2016 ,57 (Suppl 1) :i2-i10.
[27] Laurent A, Blasi F. Differential DNA damage signalling and apoptotic threshold correlate with mouse epiblast-specific hypersensitivity to radiation[J]. Development, 2015, 142(21): 3675-3685.
[28] Rodriguesmoreira S, Moreno S G, Ghinatti G, et al. Low-dose irradiation promotes persistent oxidative stress and decreases self-renewal in hematopoietic stem cells[J]. Cell Reports, 2017, 20(13): 3199-3211.
[29] Sergeeva V A, Ershova E S, Veiko N N, et al. Low-dose ionizing radiation affects mesenchymal stem cells via extracellular oxidized cell-free DNA: a possible mediator of bystander effect and adaptive response [J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2017,1-22.
[30] Alessio N, Gaudio S D, Capasso S, et al. Low dose radiation induced senescence of human mesenchymal stromal cells and impaired the autophagy process[J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(10): 8155-8166.
[31] Wang Z D, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in apoptosis of testicular cells induced by low-dose radiation[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology-medical Sciences, 2013, 33(4): 551-558.
[32] Eom H S, Park H S, You G E, et al. Identification of cellular responses to low-dose radiation by the profiling of phosphorylated proteins in human B-lymphoblast IM-9 cells[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2017, 93 (11) : 1207-1216.
[33] Miller M L. A certified health physicist's reflections on a 40-year career in radiationprotection[J].Dose Response, 2016, 14(4):1-3.
[34] Graham J D. Comparing opportunities to reduce health risks:toxin control, medicine and injury prevention[R]. NCPA Policy Report No. 192. Dallas, TX: National Center for Policy Analysis;1995. http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/st192.pdf. Updated July 1,1995.
[35] Genn Saji. 福岛核事故后未来疏散方向的安全分析报告——经验教训[A]. 第21界国际核工程大会论文集. 2013.
[36] Ketchum L E. Lessons of Chernobyl: SNM members try to decontaminate the world threatened by fallout[J]. J Nucl Med, 1987, 28(6):933-941.
[37] American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures[S]. [PP 25-A 2011]. http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/detai ls.asp?id¼318&type¼PP. Updated April 10, 2018. AccessedAprial 30, 2020.
[38] Wei L C, Ding Y X, Liu Y H, et al. Low-dose radiation stimulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, neural stem cell proliferation and neurogenesis of the mouse hippocampus in vitro and in vivo[J].Curr Alzheimer Res,2012,9(3):278-289.
[39] Ring J, Tupin E, Elder D, et al. Health Physics Society Comments to U.S. environmental protection agency regulatory reform task force[J]. Health Phys, 2018,114(5):507-510.
[40] US Government Accountability Office. Low dose radiation: interagency collaboration on planning research could improve information on health effects[R]. Washington, DC: US GAO,2017:17-546.
[41] US Congress. HR 589—Department of Energy Research and Innovation Act [online]. 2018. Available at https://www.congress. gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/589. Accessed 16 April 2020.
[42] Boice J D, Ellis E D, Golden A P, et al. The past informs the future: An overview of the million worker study and the Mallinckrodt chemical works cohort[J]. Health Phys ,2018,114:381-385.
[43] John E Till , Harold L Beck, Helen A, et al. A review of dosimetry used in epidemiological studies considered to evaluate the linear nothreshold(LNT) dose-response model for radiation protection[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2017,93(10):1128-1144.
[44] National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Health effects of low doses of radiation: perspectives on integrating radiation biology and epidemiology[R]. NCRP Commentary 24,Bethesda,MD: NCRP, 2015.
[45] Tharmalingam S, Sreetharan S, Brooks A L, et al. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies[J]. Chemico-Biological Interactions,2019,301:54-67.
[46] Abelquist E W. To mitigate the lnt model's unintended consequences-a proposed stopping point for as low as reasonably achievable[J]. Health Physics, 2019, 117(6): 592-597.
[47] Shamoun D Y. Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2016,77:49-53.
[48] Doss M. Future of radiation protection regulations[J]. Health Physics, 2016, 110(3): 274-275.
[49] Doss M. Linear no-threshold model vs. radiation hormesis[J]. Dose Response, 2013, 11(4): 480-497.
[50] Sacks B, Siegel J A. Preserving the anti-scientific linear no-threshold myth: authority, agnosticism, transparency, and the standard of care[J]. Dose Response, 2017, 15(3):1-4.