核电厂放射性废气“活性炭加压吸附”技术研究

辐射防护 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 536-541.

核电厂放射性废气“活性炭加压吸附”技术研究

范雯雯, 王艺霖, 高瑞发

中国核电工程有限公司,北京 100840

收稿日期:2021-04-07 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-12-06
作者简介:范雯雯(1983—),女,2005年毕业于青岛大学应用化学专业,2008年硕士毕业于华东理工大学化学工程专业,高级工程师。E-mail: lyla4065@163.com

Study on “Activated Carbon Pressurized Adsorption” for NPPs' radioactive gaseous wastes

FAN Wenwen, WANG Yilin, GAO Ruifa

China Nuclear Power Engineering Co. Ltd., Beijing 100840

Received:2021-04-07 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于ACP100废气源项,对“活性炭加压吸附”废气处理技术(即“压缩+活性炭延迟衰变”工艺),与M310堆型的加压贮存和AP1000、VVER的常压吸附技术进行对比分析,发现“压缩+活性炭延迟衰变”工艺的炭装量同比常压吸附减少75%,衰变容积同比加压贮存减少92%;处理后废气的放射性活度浓度,同比M310和AP1000分别下降47%和93%;二次废物产生量小,二次固废产生量设计值为1.2 m³/a。综上,“压缩+活性炭延迟衰变”废气处理工艺,既解决了现有技术问题,还具备净化效果好、二次废物产生量低、占地面积小和经济性好等优点,在其他工程具备可应用和推广性。

关键词: 加压, 活性炭, 衰变, 废气

Abstract: The gaseous waste source of ACP100 was introduced for the difference analysis with “Activated Carbon Pressurized Adsorption”, M310 pressured storage and AP1000/VVER atmospheric pressure adsorption. It was found that the needed carbon loading of the “pressurized and activated carbon delayed decay” process decreased by 75% compared with that of the atmospheric pressure adsorption and the decay volume decreased by 92% compared with that of the pressurized storage. The radioactivity concentration of the treated waste gas decreased by 47% and 93% respectively compared with that of the M310 and AP1000. The amount of secondary waste is small, and the design value for secondary solid waste generation is 1.2 m³/a. In summary, the “pressured and activated carbon delayed decay” gaseous waste treatment process not only solves the existing technical trouble, but also has good purification effect, low secondary waste generation, small floor space, as well as good economic benefits, etc. This process can be applied and promoted in other NPPs.

Key words: pressured, activated carbon, decay, gaseous waste

中图分类号:

TL941+.2

范雯雯, 王艺霖, 高瑞发. 核电厂放射性废气“活性炭加压吸附”技术研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2021, 41(6): 536-541.

FAN Wenwen, WANG Yilin, GAO Ruifa. Study on “Activated Carbon Pressurized Adsorption” for NPPs' radioactive gaseous wastes[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2021, 41(6): 536-541.

[1]	董亮, 刘红坤, 唐辉, 刘一鸣, 刘妍. M310核电站含氢废气处理系统容量分析及优化[J]. 辐射防护, 2021, 41(6): 523-529.
[2]	张永康, 骆枫, 李振臣, 杨辉青. 某同位素生产线放射性废气处理系统设计[J]. 辐射防护, 2021, 41(5): 447-452.
[3]	王坤俊, 常森, 王龙江, 李永国, 侯建荣, 丘丹圭. 浸渍活性炭性能和微观结构老化效应研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2021, 41(4): 351-358.
[4]	孟丹, 马弢, 李建伟, 张富国, 畅翔, 杨屹, 杨柳, 马英豪. 短寿命核素气溶胶监测相关问题探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(6): 565-570.
[5]	孙祁, 盖文佳, 江灏, 闫洋洋, 黄欣杰, 梁云, 祝娇, 苏默龙. 地下工程降氡技术的应用与现状[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(5): 462-469.
[6]	余达万, 徐宏明, 周辰昊, 郭喜良, 余达宇, 姜春辉. 秦山核电基地放射性废物最小化技术实践与探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(3): 213-220.
[7]	邓飞, 周睿东, 蒋岚, 陈文涛, 程晓波, 马曦, 韩静, 孔令丰, 余慧婷. 核医学含碘废水排放管理的一些问题[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(3): 252-257.
[8]	李永国, 王龙江, 史英霞, 王坤俊, 吕阳, 张继荣, 丘丹圭, 侯建荣, 刘群, 徐洋洋. 核电站滞留床用活性炭的性能研究和选择[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 148-154.
[9]	余达万, 徐宏明, 杨永亮, 郭喜良. 核电厂废过滤器芯子分类处理方法与实践[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(1): 65-70.
[10]	乔太飞, 张渊, 马英, 陈建利, 俞杰, 李彦樟. 碘吸附器用吸附介质的国内外标准差异对比与分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2017, 37(6): 495-500.
[11]	刘羽, 牛俐珺, 李永国, 唐邵华, 霍明, 史英霞, 丘丹圭, 王志民, 乔太飞, 吴波. 不同工况下活性炭吸附放射性惰性气体性能的初步研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2017, 37(4): 298-302.