高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展

辐射防护 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 101-109.

• 专题——处置安全全过程系统分析 • 上一篇下一篇

高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展

凌辉, 王驹, 陈伟明, 陈亮

核工业北京地质研究院,中核高放废物地质处置评价技术重点实验室,北京 100029

收稿日期:2017-03-02 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2020-07-20
作者简介:凌辉(1986—),男,2008年毕业于江西师范大学数学与应用数学专业;2012年毕业于南华大学市政工程专业,现为核工业北京地质研究院地质资源与地质工程专业博士研究生。E-mail:lhui1986@126.com
基金资助:
环境保护部核与辐射安全监管明细项目(JD201756);核工业北京地质研究院院长青年科技创新基金资助项目(环QJ1601)。

Progress on the safety case for geological disposal of high level radioactive waste

LING Hui, WANG Ju, CHEN Weiming, CHEN Liang

CNNC Key Laboratory on Geological of Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste,Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology,Beijing 100029

Received:2017-03-02 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高水平放射性废物(以下简称“高放废物”)地质处置安全全过程系统分析是对处置库长期安全的综合性系统分析。本文论述了安全全过程系统分析的概念及近20年发展情况,强调了其在高放废物地质处置库规划、选址、设计、建设、运行、关闭和关闭后等各阶段的重要性。以国际原子能机构(IAEA)和经合组织核能署(NEA)技术文件为主,阐述了安全全过程系统分析的背景、安全策略、评价基础、安全评价及综合等核心组成部分,列举了其应用中管理和技术方面的12个关键点,分析了芬兰、瑞典、美国和法国的研究应用现状,并对我国放射性废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析的发展及应用现状进行了探讨。

关键词: 高放废物, 地质处置, 安全全过程系统分析, 管理, 技术, 应用

Abstract: Safety case for high level radioactive waste geological disposal is a systematic analysis of the long-term safety of the repository. The concept of safety case and its development in the past 20 years are discussed. The importance in the stages of planning, site selection, design, construction, operation, closure and post-closure of high level radioactive waste disposal facility are emphasized. Based on the technical documents of NEA and IAEA, the background, objectives, safety policy, foundation, safety assessment and system integration of the safety case are described. Twelve key points of management and technology in its application are given. The research work in Finland, Sweden, the United States and France are reviewed. Finally, suggestions on development and application of safety case in China are given.

Key words: high level radioactive waste, geological disposal, safety case, management, technology, application

中图分类号:

TL942

凌辉, 王驹, 陈伟明, 陈亮. 高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 101-109.

LING Hui, WANG Ju, CHEN Weiming, CHEN Liang. Progress on the safety case for geological disposal of high level radioactive waste[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2018, 38(2): 101-109.

参考文献

[1] 陈伟明,王驹.高放废物地质处置场址安全要求[J].世界核地质科学,2006,23(2):100-106.
CHEN Weiming,WANG Ju. Site safety requirements for high level waste disposal[J].World Nuclear Geoscience,2006,23(2):100-106.
[2] 王驹.世界高放废物地质处置发展透析[J].中国核工业,2015,12:36-39.
WANG Ju.Analysis on the development of geological disposal of high level radioactive waste in the world[J].China Nuclear Industry,2015,12:36-39.
[3] McKinley I G, Alexander W R, Blaser P C. Development of geologocal disposal concepts in deep geological disposal of radioactive wastes[R].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2007.
[4] Witherspoon P A, Bodvarsson G S. Geological challenges in radioactive waste isolation:fourth worldwide review.LBNL Report 59808[R].Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,University of Califomia,Berkeley,USA,2006.
[5] Baik M H, Park T J, Kim I Y, et al.Development of a natural analogue database to support the safety case of the Korean radioactive waste disposal program[J].Swiss Geological Society,2015,108:139-146.
[6] Frank P L, Ang M L. Control of industrial major accidents hazards regulations (CIMAH)[M]. Butterworth-Heinemann,1984.
[7] Lathi L. Safety cases-within the control of industrial major accident hazards (CIMAH) regulations[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1991,27(2):232-233.
[8] NEA.Lessons learnt from 10 performance assessment studies[R]. Paris:OECD/NEA,1997.
[9] IAEA.The safety case and safety assessment for the disposal of radioactive waste[R].Safety Standards Series No.SSG-23. Vienna: IAEA, 2013.
[10] ANDRA. Dossier 2005 Argile: Evaluation of the feasibility of a geological repository in an argillaceous formation[R].Paris: ANDRA,2005.
[11] IAEA.Contents and sample arguments of a safety case for near surface disposal of radioactive waste: IAEA-TECDOC-1814[R]. Vienna:IAEA,2017.
[12] Posiva O. Safety case for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel at Olkiluoto- Synhesis[R].FINLAND:POSIVA 2012.
[13] SKB.Long-term safety for the final repository for spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark Main report of the SR-Site project,Technical Report TR-11-01[R].Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränslehantiring AB,2011.
[14] US DOE.Performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain,Nevada[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2014,122:1-6.
[15] KAERI. Geological disposal of pyroprocessed waste from PWR spent fuel in Korea, rep. KAERI-TR-4525[R].KAERI,2011.
[16] NEA.Post closure safety case for geological repositories(nature and purpose)[R]. Paris:OECD/NEA, 2004.
[17] NEA.The nature and purpose of the post-closure safety cases for geological repositories[R]. Paris:OECD/NEA,2013.
[18] NEA.Confidence in the long-term safety of deep geological repositories-Its development and communication[R]. Paris:OECD/NEA, 1999.
[19] NEA.Geological disposal of radioactive waste,safety requirements[R]. WS-R-4.Vienna:IAEA&NEA, 2006.
[20] IAEA.Disposal of radioactive waste: specific safety requirements[R]. IAEA safety standards series No. SSR-5. Vienna:IAEA, 2011.
[21] NEA.Methods for safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste:outcomes of the NEA MeSA initiative[R]. NEA No. 6923. Paris:OECD/NEA, 2012.

高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展

Progress on the safety case for geological disposal of high level radioactive waste

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 3

[1]	杨端节, 李冰, 崔浩, 侯杰. 核与辐射事故后管理策略的发展现状[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(3): 177-180.
[2]	高俊义. 高放废物处置库近场裂隙水流-传热-处置室间距相互作用的三维数值分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(3): 231-238.
[3]	张计荣, 张德山, 吴涛, 李永国, 王坤俊, 李彦樟, 李世军, 韩明, 丘丹圭, 孔海霞. 两种体系核空气净化系统性能评价试验方法的融合应用[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(2): 150-155.
[4]	俞泽阳, 贾迎春, 王昊雨, 胡智军. 新一代多模型迭代算法在70 kVp成人副鼻窦CT扫描中的应用[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(2): 156-161.
[5]	姚振, 赵敏艳, 刘玉龙. 红外热成像技术在辐射防护及其他医学领域中的应用[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(1): 78-83.
[6]	黄彦君,贺毅,上官志洪,陈超峰,赵锋. 核电厂应急监测计划的关键问题及探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(5): 355-364.
[7]	凌辉,王驹,刘月妙,高玉峰,陈伟明,佟强. 近场核素释放率对缓冲材料参数的敏感性研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(5): 403-409.
[8]	李金凤, 陈凌. 经合组织核能署放射性废物管理和退役活动概述[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(4): 314-321.
[9]	高琳锋, 姚岩岩, 王雷, 张渊, 赵高昕. 碘同位素交换反应在碘吸附器性能评价应用中的可行性研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(2): 124-129.
[10]	陈世万, 王贵宾, 杨春和, 王勇, 史文兵. 高放废物处置库围岩开挖损伤区研究的关键问题及进展[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(2): 137-149.
[11]	付亚茹, 潘楠, 梅其良, 李怀斌, 毛兰方. 核电厂技术规格书冷却剂放射性比活度运行限制条件确定方法研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(1): 40-44.
[12]	乔太飞, 孔海霞, 史英霞, 侯建荣, 王佳, 韩丽红. 国内核电厂水过滤器滤芯标准现状与讨论[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 155-160.
[13]	姜子英, 张燕齐, 温保印, 廖海涛, 李红. 球床高温气冷堆核电站放射性废物最小化策略研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 161-170.
[14]	李静晶, 刘森林, 李金凤, 张燕齐, 廖海涛. 放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析中的指标[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 89-94.
[15]	邱国华, 李金凤, 刘森林, 范仲, 陈运利. 放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及有关问题的探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 95-100.