放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及有关问题的探讨

辐射防护 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 95-100.

• 专题——处置安全全过程系统分析 • 上一篇下一篇

放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及有关问题的探讨

邱国华¹, 李金凤², 刘森林², 范仲¹, 陈运利¹

1.中核清原环境技术工程有限责任公司, 北京 100037;
2.中国原子能科学研究院,北京 102413

收稿日期:2017-04-25 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2020-07-20
作者简介:邱国华(1981—),男,2002年毕业于南昌航空大学环境工程专业,2005年硕士毕业于上海大学环境工程专业,2013年毕业于中国原子能科学研究院辐射防护及环境保护专业,获博士学位,高级工程师(研究员级)。E-mail:nanqiuguohua@163.com

Discussion on the safety case and related issues for the disposal of radioactive waste

QIU Guohua¹, LI Jinfeng², LIU Senlin², FAN Zhong¹, CHEN Yunli¹

1. CNNC Everclean Environmental Technology Engineering Co. Ltd., Beijing 100037;
2. China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413

Received:2017-04-25 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文根据IAEA第SSG-23号安全导则,对放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及其在英国、法国、美国、芬兰、瑞士、瑞典等国家放射性废物处置中的应用情况作了概括性的介绍。结合我国放射性废物处置管理的现状,对我国处置场的环境影响评价和安全分析中存在的主要问题进行了探讨。为促进我国安全全过程系统分析工作的全面开展,建议加快制定相关标准,将“安全全过程系统分析”作为我国放射性废物处置的许可条件,在景象开发、长期演变、坚稳性、不确定性、管理系统等方面加强研究。

关键词: 放射性废物, 处置, 安全全过程系统分析

Abstract: Based on the IAEA safety standards series No. SSG-23, the safety case for the disposal of radioactive waste and its application in the UK, France, the USA, Finland, Switzerland and Sweden were briefly introduced in this article. Combining with the management status quo of the disposal of radioactive waste in China, the main issues in current environmental impact assessment and safety analysis of disposal sites were discussed. In order to promote all-round development of safety case in China, it was suggested that relevant standards should be developed as soon as possible, safety case should be required as a condition to get the license for radioactive waste disposal, and research emphasis should be put on scenario development, long-term variations, robustness, uncertainty and management system.

Key words: radioactive waste, disposal, safety case

中图分类号:

TL942

邱国华, 李金凤, 刘森林, 范仲, 陈运利. 放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及有关问题的探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 95-100.

QIU Guohua, LI Jinfeng, LIU Senlin, FAN Zhong, CHEN Yunli. Discussion on the safety case and related issues for the disposal of radioactive waste[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2018, 38(2): 95-100.

参考文献

[1] International Atomic Energy Agency. The safety case and safety assessment for the disposal of radioactive waste: IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-23[S]. Vienna: IAEA, 2012.
[2] International Atomic Energy Agency. Near surface disposal facilities for radioactive waste:IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-29[S]. Vienna: IAEA, 2014.
[3] International Atomic Energy Agency. Disposal of radioactive waste: IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-5[S]. Vienna: IAEA, 2011.
[4] 国际原子能机构.放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析与安全评价//国际原子能机构放射性废物管理安全导则[M]. 刘森林,邱国华,李金凤(译). 北京:中国原子能出版社, 2017.
[5] LLWR. The 2011 environmental safety case - main report[R]. LLWR/ESC/R(11)10016. Holmrook: LLW Repository Limited Low Level Waste Repository Site, 2011.
[6] ANDRA. Dossier 2005: Andra research on the geological disposal of high-level long-lived radioactive waste - Results and perspectives[R]. Paris: ANDRA, 2005.
[7] SNL (Sandia National Laboratories). Total system performance assessment model/analysis for the license application[R]. MDL-WIS-PA-000005 Rev 00, AD 01. Las Vegas, NV: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 2008.
[8] Posiva Oy. Safety case for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel at Olkiluoto - Synthesis 2012[R]. FIN-27160 Eurajoki. FINLAND, 2012.
[9] Nagra. Project opalinus clay safety report - demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste[R]. Technical Report 02-05. Wettingen: National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, 2002.
[10] SKB. Safety analysis for SFR Long-term safety-Main report for the safety assessment SR-PSU[R]. Technical Report TR-14-01. Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, 2015.

放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析及有关问题的探讨

Discussion on the safety case and related issues for the disposal of radioactive waste

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 3

[1]	高俊义. 高放废物处置库近场裂隙水流-传热-处置室间距相互作用的三维数值分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(3): 231-238.
[2]	凌辉,王驹,刘月妙,高玉峰,陈伟明,佟强. 近场核素释放率对缓冲材料参数的敏感性研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(5): 403-409.
[3]	李金凤, 陈凌. 经合组织核能署放射性废物管理和退役活动概述[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(4): 314-321.
[4]	刘建琴, 魏方欣, 安鸿翔, 熊小伟. 低放固体废物核素活度浓度上限值的推导[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(3): 221-227.
[5]	刘兴伟, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 李星宇. 安全评价软件Ecolego解法器选取研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(2): 95-104.
[6]	陈世万, 王贵宾, 杨春和, 王勇, 史文兵. 高放废物处置库围岩开挖损伤区研究的关键问题及进展[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(2): 137-149.
[7]	肖建华, 张晓文, 杨蓉, 杜仁铠, 张德. 铀浓缩厂放射性废物管理与最小化实践[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(1): 61-66.
[8]	李静晶, 刘森林, 李金凤, 张燕齐, 廖海涛. 放射性废物处置安全全过程系统分析中的指标[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 89-94.
[9]	凌辉, 王驹, 陈伟明, 陈亮. 高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 101-109.
[10]	姜子英, 张燕齐, 温保印, 廖海涛, 李红. 球床高温气冷堆核电站放射性废物最小化策略研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2): 161-170.