确定环境保护风险基准的方法

Abstract

Abstract: "Excess cancer risk" can be used as environmental impact assessment endpoint for chemicals and ionizing radiation, thus the two environmental impact assessment results can be compared to each other and added up. After the same assessment endpoint determined, the determination methods of the risk criterion currently used are summarized, and the practicability and limitations of these various methods are analyzed. Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection of site remediation is finally recommended.

Key words: risk criterion, acceptable risk level, assessment endpoint, risk coefficient

Zhang Hongjian, Jiang Lili, Zhang Lihui, Wang Shijun. Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection[J].RADIATION PROTECTION, 2015, 35(6): 333-338.

References

[1] NCRP. Risk-based classification of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes[R]. NCRP Reports No.139. Bethesda, Maryland, Issued 31 December 2002:39-41.
[2] 张红见.基于健康风险的城市固体废物填埋场放射性接收标准的研究[D].北京:中国原子能科学研究院, 2011:45-46.
[3] Renn, Ortwin. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world[M]. London: Earthscan, 2008:1-11.
[4] 潘自强. 公众健康危险评价[M ]. 北京:原子能出版社, 1994: 15.
[5] Anthony Andrews. Radioactive waste streams:waste classification for disposal[R]. Order Code RL32163. Washington: Congressinal Research Service, 2006:1-35.
[6] World Health Organization (WHO). Water quality: guidelines, standards and health[M]. London: IWA Publishing, 2001:207-228.
[7] Cotruvo JA. Drinking water standards and risk assessment[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1988, 8(3): 288-299.
[8] WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality[R]. Volume 1. Recommendations. World Health Organization, Geneva,1993.
[9] 胡二邦. 环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M]. 第二版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2004:2-9.
[10] 陆华. 危险废物填埋场地下水污染的健康风险评估[J]. 化学世界, 2014, 55(6): 338-340.
[11] 国际放射防护委员会. 国际放射防护委员会2007年建议书[M]. 国际放射防护委员会第103号出版物. 潘自强, 等译. 北京. 原子能出版社, 2007.
[12] IAEA. Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance[R]. Safety Standards Series. No. RS-G-1.7. Vienna, 2004.
[13] UNSCEAR. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation[R]. 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations Sales Publication E.00.IX.3. United Nations, New York, 2000:5.
[14] 潘自强, 刘森林. 中国辐射效应[M]. 北京:原子能出版社,2010:2.
[15] Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, et al. Acceptable risk[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[16] Mark Malander. Selection of carcinogenic target risk levels for soil and groundwater remediation[EB/OL]. [2010-01-30]. http://www.epa.gov/oust/rbdm/sctrlsgw.htm.
[17] US EPA. National oil and hazardous substances pollution contingency plan-final rule[R]. Federal Register 55: CFR Part 300:666. 1990.
[18] US EPA. Role of the baseline risk assessment in superfund remedy selection decisions[R/OL]. OSWER Directive 1991. 9355.0-30. [2010-1-30]. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessm-ent/baseline.htm.
[19] USEPA. Clean air act. 42 USC 7412(f)[R]. 1990.
[20] 环境保护部环境工程评估中心. 环境影响评价案例分析[M]. 第7版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社2014: 1-450.
[21] Yang H. Some considerations for comparing risk of radiation and chemicals[C/OL]//the Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association. Hiroshima : IRPA, May 14-19 2000[2012-11-10]. http://www2000.irpa.net/irpa10/cdrom/00509.pdf.
[22] International Agency of Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans[M]. Vol.92.//Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures. World Health Organization, Lyon, France, 2010:12-14.

Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10