辐射防护 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 126-133.

• 辐射监测 • 上一篇    下一篇

β-γ混合辐射场中定向剂量当量率$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)的监测方法研究

冯梅1,2,3, 韦应靖1, 肖佐诗4, 何兴旭4, 崔伟1, 唐智辉1, 刘新昊1   

  1. 1.中国辐射防护研究院,太原 030006;
    2.辐射安全与防护山西省重点实验室,太原 030006;
    3.中核集团辐射防护技术重点实验室,太原 030006;
    4.海南核电有限公司,海口 570100
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-26 发布日期:2026-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 韦应靖。E-mail:weiyj531@sina.com
  • 作者简介:冯梅(1988—),女,2011年毕业于西南科技大学国防科技学院辐射防护及环境工程专业,2014年毕业于中国辐射防护研究院辐射防护及环境保护专业,获硕士学位,副研究员。E-mail:fengmei_cirp@126.com

Measurement of directional dose equivalent rate $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07) in β-γ mixed radiation field

FENG Mei1,2,3, WEI Yingjing1, XIAO Zuoshi4, HE Xingxu4, CUI Wei1, TANG Zhihui1, LIU Xinhao1   

  1. 1. China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006;
    2. Key Laboratory of Radiation Safety and Protection in Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030006;
    3. Key Laboratory of Radiation Protection Technology of China National Nuclear Corporation, Taiyuan 030006;
    4. Hainan Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Haikou 570100
  • Received:2025-11-26 Published:2026-04-22

摘要: 为解决β-γ混合辐射场中定向剂量当量率$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)的准确测量难题,基于β-γ混合辐射场中β射线和γ射线的能量特性,结合周围剂量当量率$\dot{H}$*(10)监测仪、$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)监测仪、β能谱仪和γ能谱仪的测量结果,建立了一种在β-γ混合辐射场中测量$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)的方法,同时建立了标准β-γ混合辐射场并对测量方法进行了验证。采用建立的方法对测量数据进行处理后,得到的$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07,45°)值与标准装置测出的$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07,45°)约定真值相对误差从13.0%降至2.69%,验证了方法的可靠性。在现场应用中,对海南核电106大修期间13个位置的β-γ混合辐射场中$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)进行测量,测得$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)/$\dot{H}$*(10)比值在2.06~29.1之间,平均值为9.64,$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)总体比$\dot{H}$*(10)高约1个数量级,可见β辐射对个人剂量的贡献不可忽视。实现β-γ混合辐射场中$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07)的准确测量能更准确评估工作人员所面临的辐射风险,同时为核设施现场辐射防护决策提供重要依据。

关键词: β-γ混合辐射场, 定向剂量当量率$\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07), 周围剂量当量率$\dot{H}$*(10), 校准因子修正

Abstract: To address the challenge of accurately determining the directional dose equivalent rate $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07) in β-γ mixed radiation fields, a novel measurement methodology is proposed. This approach integrates measurements from ambient dose equivalent rate monitors, directional dose equivalent rate monitors, β spectrometers, and γ spectrometers. A β-γ mixed standard radiation field was established to verify this method.Following application of the methodology proposed in this study, the relative error between the measured $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07, 45°) value and the reference value traceable to a certified standard instrument was reduced from 13.0% to 2.69%, verifying the method’s reliability.In field applications, $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07) was measured and data were processed at 14 locations exposed to β-γ mixed radiation fields during the No.106 overhaul of Hainan nuclear power plant. The measured '(0.07)$\dot{H}$*(10) ratios ranged from 2.06 to 29.1, with a mean value of 9.64—indicating that $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07) was, on average, approximately one order of magnitude greater than $\dot{H}$*(10). Accurate quantification of $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07) in β-γ mixed fields is therefore essential for reliable assessment of occupational exposure risk and provides critical input for radiation protection decision-making in nuclear facilities.

Key words: β-γ mixed radiation field, directional dose equivalent rate $\dot{H}^{\prime}$(0.07);ambient dose equivalent rate $\dot{H}$*(10), calibration factor correction

中图分类号: 

  • TL75