应急排气管道对主烟囱中速度及气体混合的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用计算流体力学(CFD)方法,模拟内部的应急排气管道存在与否对主烟道内气体组分混合的影响情况。以速度及示踪气体浓度的变异系数(COV)表征截面混合均匀性,对比研究了高风速(约13.1 m/s)、中风速(约8.2 m/s)、低风速(约0.56 m/s)三种典型工况。结果表明:主烟道内风速13.1 m/s,无内部管道可使速度及气体浓度分布更为均匀,各截面平均COV值分别降低2.8%和2.0%;风速8.2 m/s,无内部管道利于速度均匀分布(COV值降低1.5%),却降低气体组分的混合均匀性(COV值升高3.1%);风速0.56 m/s,速度和气体组分在无内部管道时呈现更好的混合均匀性,COV值分别降低4.8%和0.02%。对比仿真结果与实验数据,92.5%以上的仿真数据与实验值偏差低于15%。

关键词: 计算流体力学, 烟囱内部结构, 混合均匀性

Abstract: The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is used to simulate the influence of the emergency exhaust pipe on the gas component mixing inside the main chimney. The coefficient of variation (COV) of velocity and tracer gas concentration are used to represent the mixing uniformity on each surface. Three typical working conditions were compared and studied, namely high wind speed (about 13.1 m/s), medium wind speed (about 8.2 m/s) and low wind speed (about 0.56 m/s). The results show that when the wind speed is 13.1 m/s and there is no internal pipe, the distribution of velocity and gas concentration is more uniform, and the COV values on each surface are reduced by 2.8% and 2.0% respectively; When the wind speed is 8.2 m/s and there is no internal pipe, it is conducive to the uniform distribution of velocity (COV value decreases by 1.5%), but reduces the mixing uniformity of gas components (COV value increases by 3.1%); When the wind speed is 0.56 m/s and there is no emergency exhaust pipe, the velocity and gas components show better mixing uniformity, and the COV values are reduced by 4.8% and 0.02% respectively. Comparing the simulation results with experimental data, more than 92.5% of the simulation data has a deviation of less than 15% from the experimental values.

Key words: computational fluid dynamics, internal structure of chimney, gas mixing uniformity

中图分类号:

TL75

郑金阁, 程卫亚, 刘伟富, 郝桂珍, 王晨潇, 郭浩城, 赵宇伦, 陈凌. 应急排气管道对主烟囱中速度及气体混合的影响[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(2): 131-140.

ZHENG Jinge, CHENG Weiya, LIU Weifu, HAO Guizhen, WANG Chenxiao, GUO Haocheng, ZHAO Yulun, CHEN Ling. The influence of emergency exhaust pipe on the velocity and gas mixing in main chimney[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2022, 42(2): 131-140.

参考文献

[1] 卢正永.核设施烟囱和管道气载放射性排放物的取样监测——美国新标准介绍(一)[J].辐射防护通讯,2003,23(1):35-39.
LU Zhengyong. Sampling and monitoring releases of airborne radioactive substances from the stacks and ducts of nuclear facilities—introduction to new standards of the america: part I[J]. Radiation Protection Bulletin,2003,23(1):35-39.
[2] 蒋婧,何玮,徐春艳,等.核设施烟囱气态流出物取样代表性验证的技术要求研究[J].辐射防护,2016,36(6):350-357.
JIANG Jing,HE Wei,XU Chunyan,et al. Study on qualification methods and technologies of sampling representativeness of airborne effluents from the stacks of nuclear facilities[J]. Radiation Protection,2016,36(6): 350-357.
[3] Glissmeyer J,Antonio E,Flaherty J,et al. Assessment of the LV-C2 stack sampling probe location for compliance with ANSI/HPS N13.1—1999[R]. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,2015.
[4] Mcfarland A R,Gupta R,Anand N K . Suitability of air sampling locations downstream of bends and static mixing elements[J]. Health Physics,1999,77(6):703-712.
[5] Seo Y. Degree of mixing downstream of rectangular bends and design of an inlet for ambient aerosol[D]. Texas A&M University,2004.
[6] Anand M,Mcfarland A R,Rajagopal K R . Gas mixing for achieving suitable conditions for single point aerosol sampling in a straight tube: experimental and numerical results[J]. Health Physics,2003,84(1):82-91.
[7] TANG Y,GUO B. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of aerosol transport and deposition[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China,2011,5(3):362-377.
[8] Schwer L E. An overview of the PTC 60/V&V 10: guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics[J]. Engineering with Computers,2007,23:245-252.
[9] 中国电子科技集团公司第三十八研究所,上海湃睿信息科技有限公司,合肥京联信息科技有限公司. 机械产品结构有限元力学分析通用规则:GB/T 33582—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2017.
[10] 叶涛.多组分粉体混合过程的理论分析与实验研究[D].武汉理工大学,2009.
YE Tao. Theoretical analysis and experimental study for process of multicomponent powders mixing[D].Wuhan University of Technology,2009.
[11] ISO.Sampling airborne radioactive materials from the stacks and ducts of nuclear facilities:ISO 2889—2010[S].2010.
[12] Ballinger M Y,Barnett J M,Glissmeyer J A,et al. Evaluation of sampling locations for two radionuclide air-sampling systems based on the requirements of ANSI/HPS N13.1—1999.[J]. Health Physics,2004,86(4):406-415.
[13] 董信芳,李航,丁世海,等.“华龙一号”核电厂烟囱气态流出物取样系统验证的试验与分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(1):52-57.
DONG Xinfang,LI Hang,DING Shihai,et al. Verification for the representative sampling system of “Hualong I” NPP gaseous effluent: test and analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Health,2018,27(1):52-57.
[14] Oreskes N,Shrader-Frechette K.Verfication,validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences[J].Science,1994,263:641-646.
[15] 钱丛昊. 燃煤电厂排放烟气流速与气体污染物排放量测量方法的研究[D].东南大学,2019.
QIAN Conghao. Research on measurement method of flue gas velocity and gas pollutant emission from coal-fired power plants[D]. Southeast University,2019.
[16] 杨光俊,丁力,郭照冰.基于CFD方法的燃煤电厂烟气排放数值模拟[J].环境科学研究,2017,30(12):1934-1943.
YANG Guangjun,DING Li,GUO Zhaobing,Numerical simulation of flue gas emissions from coal-fired power plants using computational fluid dynamics method[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2017,30(12) :1934- 1943.