辐射防护 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 180-188.

• 辐射防护监测 • 上一篇    下一篇

参加美国EML组织的国际比对项目总结

任晓娜, 宋海龙, 韩玉虎, 王瑞俊, 黄治俭   

  1. 中国辐射防护研究院,太原 030006
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-05 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2021-11-11
  • 作者简介:任晓娜(1966—)女,1988年毕业于西安交通大学堆工专业,1991年毕业于中国辐射防护研究院环境保护专业,获硕士学位,1999年毕业于中国原子能科学研究院辐射防护专业,获博士学位,研究员。E-mail :rxn-001@163.com

Report on CIRP participitation in international inter-comparison projects organized by US EML

Ren Xiaona, Song Hailong, Han Yuhu, Wang Ruijun, Huang Zhijian   

  1. China Institute for Radiation Proctection,Taiyuan 030006
  • Received:2016-09-05 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2021-11-11

摘要: 介绍1997—2004年间中国辐射防护研究院分析测试中心参加的美国EML组织的检验环境放射性测量质量的一个项目,分析了3种介质的43个样品,本实验室共报出了212个数据。所报出数据的通过率为97%,3%未通过。未通过数据3种介质均有,涉及4个核素,分别为241Am、60Co、57Co和54Mn。通过实验室间比对,表明:(1)本实验室γ谱分析的效率刻度是相对准确的,未发现系统误差。(2)γ谱分析中低能核素被干扰问题仍需进一步解决。

关键词: 环境介质, 放射性测量, 实验室间比对, 评判标准

Abstract: China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP) has participated in a quality assessment program organized by US EML for testing the quality of environmental radioactivity measurements from 1997 to 2004. A total number of 43 samples in three different matrices were analyzed, and 212 analytical results were presented. For the evaluation performance, 97% of the results were designated as A (Acceptable) and 3% as N (Not Acceptable). The N (Not Acceptable) results were found for four nuclides in all three sample matrices including 241Am, 60Co, 57Co and 54Mn. The evaluation results of this inter-comparison project showed that the efficiency calibration for γ spectrometry analysis at CIRP has been acceptable but the interferences on the low-energy radionuclides has not yet been treated very well.

Key words: environmental matrix, radionuclide measurement, interlaboratory comparison, evaluation criteriaofic

中图分类号: 

  • X830.5