我国南方某核厂址蟾蜍剂量率评估的比较研究

辐射防护 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 14-21.

我国南方某核厂址蟾蜍剂量率评估的比较研究

韩宝华¹, 李建国¹, 黄鹏², 韩学垒³, 郜燕², 马炳辉¹, 尚红莲², 王慧娟¹

1.中国辐射防护研究院,太原 030006;
2.中核四川环保工程有限责任公司,四川广元 628000;
3.山东核电有限公司,山东海阳 265116

收稿日期:2014-12-13 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2021-11-12
作者简介:韩宝华(1969—),女,1992年毕业于山西大学化学系,2007年获中国辐射防护研究院环境科学专业硕士学位,副研究员。E-mail:hbaohua918@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“我国核场址非人类物种辐射影响评价研究”(项目批准号:10975120)。

Comparative assessment of dose rate for toad at a nuclear site in southern China

Han Baohua¹, Li Jianguo¹, Huang Peng², Han Xuelei³, Gao Yan², Ma Binghui¹, Shang Honglian², Wang Huijuan¹

1. China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006;
2. Sichuan Environmental Protection Engineering Co. Ltd, CNNC, Sichuan Guangyuan 628000;
3. Shandong Naclear Power Company Ltd, Shandong Haiyang 265116

Received:2014-12-13 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2021-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择我国南方某核厂址两栖动物——蟾蜍作为参考生物,建立了蟾蜍的生物解剖学模型和外照射环境模型。采用蒙特卡罗模拟技术计算源介质中放射性核素¹³⁷Cs、⁹⁰Sr和²³⁹Pu对靶组织/器官的辐射剂量率,由此计算蟾蜍整体的辐射剂量率。采用ERICA程序和RESRAD-BIOTA程序计算蟾蜍的剂量率,并与解剖学模型进行比较。结果表明:三种方法计算的蟾蜍内照射剂量率基本一致;由于外照射环境模型的不同,外照射剂量率估算结果并不相同,ERICA程序与解剖学模型计算的外照射剂量率结果更接近;解剖学模型关注生物组织/器官的辐射剂量,对于核素分布不均匀的生物个体研究具有重要的意义。

关键词: 蟾蜍, 解剖学模型, ERICA程序, RESRAD-BIOTA程序

Abstract: Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) was chosen as the referencing of amphibian at a nuclear site in southern China. The biological anatomy dosimetric model and environmental geometries were established. Using Monte-Carlo simulation techniques, the dose rates of target tissues/organs from media about ¹³⁷Cs, ⁹⁰Sr and ²³⁹Pu were calculated, thereby the dose rates of the whole toad body were calculated. The paper used ERICA tool and RESRAD-BIOTA code to calculate the dose rates of toad, comparing with the anatomical model. The results indicated that dose rates for internal exposure compare well among three approaches. For external exposure, differing environmental geometries assumption, the results of external dose rates were different. The anatomical model concerned with radionuclide distribution in individual tissue/organ is of great importance in investigating the biological individuals that of heterogeneous distribution of radionuclides.

Key words: toad, anatomical model, ERICA tool, RESRAD-BIOTA code

中图分类号:

R144.1

韩宝华, 李建国, 黄鹏, 韩学垒, 郜燕, 马炳辉, 尚红莲, 王慧娟. 我国南方某核厂址蟾蜍剂量率评估的比较研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2016, 36(1): 14-21.

Han Baohua, Li Jianguo, Huang Peng, Han Xuelei, Gao Yan, Ma Binghui, Shang Honglian, Wang Huijuan. Comparative assessment of dose rate for toad at a nuclear site in southern China[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2016, 36(1): 14-21.

参考文献

[1] ICRP. The 2007 recommendation of the international commission on radiological commission on radiological protection[R]. ICRP Publication 103. 2007.
[2] ICRP. Environmental protection: the concept and use of reference animals and plants[R]. ICRP Publication 108. 2008.
[3] Yankovich TL, Vivesi Batlle J, Vives-Lynch S, et al. An international model validation exercise on radionuclide transfer and doses to freshwater biota[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2010, 30 :299-340.
[4] Beresford NA, Barnett CL, Brown JE, et al. Predicting the radiation exposure of terrestrial wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: an international comparison of approaches[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2010, 30:341-373.
[5] Carl-Magnus Larsson. An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2008, 99 :1 364-1 370.
[6] USDOE. Technical Standard DOE-STD-1153—2002 Graded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota[S]. Washington DC, USA, 2002.
[7] International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements(ICRU). Photon, electron, proton, and neutron interaction data for body tissues[R]. ICRU Report 46. Bethesda, MD:ICRU,1992.
[8] ICRP. Radionuclide transformations-energy and intensity of emissions[R].ICRP Publication 38. 1983.
[9] Blaylock BG, Frank ML, O’Neal BR. Methodology for estimating radiation dose rates to freshwater biota exposed to radionuclides in the environment[R]. US Department of Energy,1993.
[10] IAEA. Environmental Modeling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS) programe, Modelling the transfer of radionuclides to non-human biological species[R]. DRAFT Biota Working Group Report, 2008.
[11] Brown JE, Alfonso B, Avila R, et al. The ERICA Tool[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2008, 99:1 371-1 383.
[12] Beresford NA, Gaschak S, Barnett CL, et al. Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone——A test application of the ERICA Tool[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2008, 99:1 496-1 502.
[13] Morris RC. Applying DOE’s Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2006, 87:77-100.
[14] Kathryn A, Higley, Stephen L, et al. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2003, 66: 41-59.