辐射防护 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 273-279.doi: 10.27045/j.1000-8187.202603010

• 辐射防护标准与规定 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于修订GB 18871—2002中核素半衰期的分析与讨论

李卓岱1, 杜金秋1, 刘弓冶2, 关庆涛3, 杨掌众1   

  1. 1.国家海洋环境监测中心,辽宁 大连 116023;
    2.生态环境部辐射环境监测技术中心,杭州 310012;
    3.辽宁省核与辐射安全监测中心,辽宁 大连 116023
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-25 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 杜金秋。E-mail: jinqiu609@163.com
  • 作者简介:李卓岱(1996—),男,2017年本科毕业于华北水利水电大学核工程与核技术专业,2020年毕业于东华理工大学核科学与技术专业,获硕士学位;2024年毕业于兰州大学核科学与技术专业,获博士学位。E-mail: zdli@nmemc.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:中国合格评定国家认可委员会科技项目“放射性检测领域认可关键技术研究”(2024CNAS25)。

Analysis and discussion on the expression of radionuclide half-life in standard GB 18871—2002

LI Zhuodai1, DU Jinqiu1, LIU Gongye2, GUAN Qingtao3, YANG Zhangzhong1   

  1. 1. National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center,Liaoning Dalian 116023;
    2. Radiation Monitoring Technical Center of Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Hangzhou 310012;
    3. Liaoning Provincial Nuclear and Radiation Safety Monitoring Center,Liaoning Dalian 116023
  • Received:2025-11-25 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-06-18

摘要: 《电离辐射防护与辐射源安全基本标准》(GB 18871—2002)在我国辐射防护与安全领域发挥着纲领性作用。针对标准实施二十余年来核物理数据的更新以及标准文本中部分表述的严谨性问题,本文开展了系统的梳理与数据比对。首先,针对标准中单一核素存在“2个半衰期”的表述,结合同质异能素的衰变机制与分类逻辑进行了探讨,厘清了核素定义与半衰期的对应关系;其次,基于权威核数据库,对标准附录B中的核素半衰期数据进行了校核。发现部分核素“2个半衰期”的表述方式容易引起概念混淆,同时随着测量精度的提高,部分核素的半衰期推荐值已发生变化,其中60Fe和79Se等长寿命核素的最新半衰期数据与标准现行值存在数量级的偏差。基于上述分析,提出了针对 GB 18871—2002 中相关表述的修订建议及部分亟须更新的半衰期数据清单,以期进一步增强标准的科学性与现势性。

关键词: 核素, 半衰期, GB 18871—2002, 同质异能素

Abstract: The "Basic Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and Safety of Radiation Sources" (GB 18871—2002) plays a guiding role in China′s radiation protection and safety efforts. Addressing the updates in nuclear physics data over the more than twenty years since the standard′s implementation, as well as the rigor of certain expressions within the standard text, this paper conducts a systematic theoretical review and data comparison. First, the expression of "two half-lives" for a single radionuclide in the standard is discussed in conjunction with the decay mechanisms and classification logic of isomers, clarifying the relationship between radionuclide definition and half-life. Second, based on the latest authoritative nuclear databases, a comprehensive verification of the radionuclide half-life data in Appendix B of the standard was performed. The study found that with the improvement of measurement precision, the recommended half-life values for certain radionuclides have changed significantly. Notably, the latest half-life data for long-lived radionuclides such as 60Fe and 79Se show deviations of orders of magnitude compared to the current values in the standard. Based on these analyses, this paper proposes revision suggestions for relevant expressions and a list of half-life data urgently needing updates in GB 18871—2002, aiming to further enhance the scientific rigor and currency of the standard.

Key words: nuclide, half-life, GB 18871—2002, isomer