基于自适应源项离散的点核积分方法计算效率优化研究

辐射防护 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 490-498.

基于自适应源项离散的点核积分方法计算效率优化研究

赵原^1,2,3, 龙泽宇^2,3, 李华⁴, 宋佩涛^2,3, 韦加富^2,3, 刘立业^2,3, 陈凌¹

1.中国原子能科学研究院,北京 102413;
2.中国辐射防护研究院辐射安全与防护山西省重点实验室,太原 030006;
3.中国辐射防护研究院中核集团辐射防护技术重点实验室,太原 030006;
4.中国辐射防护研究院核药研发转化与精准防护山西省重点实验室,太原 030006

收稿日期:2024-03-28 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-11-05
通讯作者: 刘立业。E-mail: liuliye@cirp.org.cn
作者简介:赵原(1987—),男,2009年本科毕业于清华大学核工程与核技术专业,2012年硕士毕业于中国辐射防护研究院辐射防护及环境保护专业,获硕士学位,现为中国原子能科学研究院辐射防护及环境保护专业在读博士研究生,副研究员。E-mail: zhaoyuan881@163.com
基金资助:
中核集团菁英项目(No.29);预先研究项目(32104040303)。

Calculation efficiency optimization of point kernel integration method based on adaptive source term split up

ZHAO Yuan^1,2,3, LONG Zeyu^2,3, LI Hua⁴, SONG Peitao^2,3, WEI Jiafu^2,3, LIU Liye^2,3, CHEN Ling¹

1. China Institute of Atomic Energy,Beijing 102413;
2. Shanxi Key Laboratory for Radiation Safety and Protection, China Institute for Radiation Protection,Taiyuan 030006;
3. CNNC Key Laboratory of radiation protection Technology, China Institute for Radiation Protection,Taiyuan 030006;
4. Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Translational Nuclear Medicine and Precision Protection,China Institute for Radiation Protection,Taiyuan 030006

Received:2024-03-28 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 点核积分方法面对多源项的复杂场景或是需要对辐射场进行动态更新的情形存在计算耗时较长的问题。针对该问题,通过点核积分程序CIRPDose对圆柱体源、长方体源等5类源项离散引起的误差随计算点与源距离的变化规律进行模拟计算,并提出了一种基于自适应源项离散的点核积分计算效率优化方法。在将该方法集成到CIRPDose程序后,通过自定义算例对其进行测试,测试结果显示,相比传统的固定离散数目,各类型源项在自适应离散方法下的辐射场计算用时最大缩短96.77%,且计算结果平均偏差最大值仅为3.19%,验证了所提方法的可靠性和有效性。研究工作可为核设施内的三维γ辐射场快速计算提供技术支持。

关键词: γ辐射场计算, 点核积分方法, 计算效率优化, 源项离散

Abstract: The point kernel integration method has the problem that it takes a long time to calculate complex scene with multiple source terms or the situation that the radiation field needs to be dynamically updated. To solve this problem, this study employs the point kernel integration program CIRPDose to simulate and calculate the variation law of errors resulting from the split up of source terms (a total of five types, including cylindrical source and cuboid source, etc.) in relation to the distance between the calculated point and the source, and proposes an efficiency optimization method for the point kernel integration based on adaptive source term split up. After integrating the method into the CIRPDose program, the method was tested through customized examples. The test results show that the calculation time of radiation field for each type of source term under the adaptive split up method is reduced by 96.77%, as opposed to the conventional fixed number split up method. Moreover, the maximum average deviation in the calculated results is only 3.19%, which verifies the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed method. The research presented in this paper can provide technical support for the rapid calculation of 3D gamma radiation fields in nuclear facilities.

Key words: gamma radiation field calculation, point kernel integration method, calculation efficiency optimization, source term split up

中图分类号:

TL75+1

赵原, 龙泽宇, 李华, 宋佩涛, 韦加富, 刘立业, 陈凌. 基于自适应源项离散的点核积分方法计算效率优化研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2024, 44(5): 490-498.

ZHAO Yuan, LONG Zeyu, LI Hua, SONG Peitao, WEI Jiafu, LIU Liye, CHEN Ling. Calculation efficiency optimization of point kernel integration method based on adaptive source term split up[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2024, 44(5): 490-498.

参考文献

[1] Ródenas J, Zarza I, Burgos M C, et al. Developing a virtual reality application for training nuclear power plant operators: setting up a database containing dose rates in the refuelling plant[J]. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2004, 111(2): 173-180.
[2] Jeong K S, Choi B S, Moon J K, et al. Real-time assessment of exposure dose to workers in radiological environments during decommissioning of nuclear facilities[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2014, 73: 441-445.
[3] Szöke I, Louka M N, Bryntesen T R, et al. Real-time 3D radiation risk assessment supporting simulation of work in nuclear environments[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2014, 34(2): 389-416.
[4] Vermeersch F. ALARA pre-job studies using the VISIPLAN 3D ALARA planning tool[J]. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2005, 115(1/4): 294-297.
[5] Thevenon J B, Lopez L, Chabal C, et al. Using simulation for intervention design in radiating environment: First evaluation of NARVEOS[C]//Proceedings of the GLOBAL 2009 congress. Paris, France:US Department of Energy, 2009: 504.
[6] Subbaiah K V, Sarangapani R. GUI2QAD-3D: A graphical interface program for QAD-CGPIC program[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2006, 33(1): 22-29.
[7] 袁成前.三维辐射场剂量计算与可视化技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
YUAN Chengqian. Research on 3D radiation field dose calculation and visualization technology[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
[8] 贺淑相.三维辐射场高效计算方法与可视化研究[D].北京:华北电力大学, 2017.
HE Shuxiang. Research on efficient calculation method and visualization of three-dimensional radiation field[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2017.
[9] 包彦, 贺清明, 曹良志, 等. 基于NECP-MCX的点核积分方法研究与程序研发[C]// 中国核学会2021年学术年会. 烟台: 中国核学会, 2021.
[10] 李华. γ辐射场快速计算与源项反演算法研究及初步应用[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2016.
LI Hua. Research and preliminary application of fast calculation of gamma radiation field and source term inversion algorithm[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016.
[11] 何良, 李华, 赵原, 等. 基于辐射场梯度变化的变权重网格划分方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(10): 861-865.
HE Liang, LI Hua, ZHAO Yuan, et al. Mesh generation method with variable weights based on gradient changes in a radiation field[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(10): 861-865.
[12] XU Zhihui, LI Mengkun, ZOU Bowen, et al. A GPU-based point kernel gamma dose rate computing code for virtual simulation in radiation-controlled area[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2023, 55(6): 1966-1973.
[13] Caracena T M, Gonçalves J G M, Peerani P, et al. A variable point kernel dosimetry method for virtual reality simulation applications in nuclear safeguards and security[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2013, 60(5): 3862-3871.

[1]	方春鸣, 姜冬, 郭小翠, 莫念. 核电厂液态流出物中锶-89、锶-90、铁-55、铁-59和镍-63的联合快速分析方法[J]. 辐射防护, 2024, 44(5): 469-475.
[2]	郭英来, 王虎, 陈云峰, 惠苗苗, 刘晗晗, 吴春元. 田湾核电站VVER机组的氚排放分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2024, 44(3): 240-243.
[3]	郭英来, 王虎, 陈云峰, 刘晗晗, 吴春元, 惠苗苗. 田湾核电站周边空气和雨水中氚的相关性分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2024, 44(3): 244-247.
[4]	蔺一博, 骆志平, 庞洪超, 汪传高, 陈然. 后处理厂气态流出物中I-129监测技术现状研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(5): 422-430.
[5]	陈斌, 韦应靖, 安世峰, 王雨青. 铀燃料芯块表面及操作人员弱贯穿辐射剂量监测[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(5): 473-477.
[6]	李成勋, 霍志鹏, 钟国强, 胡立群. EAST聚变装置长脉冲辐射监测及研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(5): 451-459.
[7]	徐卓群, 江致远, 田秋鑫. “华龙一号”机组大修期间反应堆厂房多源射线探伤辐射风险控制[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(S1): 44-51.
[8]	保莉, 杨有坤, 廉冰, 郭琛, 马旭媛, 杨海兰. 气载流出物中碳-14对氚测量的干扰分析[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(S1): 52-55.
[9]	尹旺明, 尤成懋, 梅翔杰, 周克波. 核电厂气态流出物监测样品分析中的核素衰变校正应用探讨[J]. 辐射防护, 2023, 43(1): 55-63.
[10]	林明贵. 宁德核电厂周围环境空气中¹⁴C的监测与评价[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(5): 418-424.
[11]	商洁, 陈吉宏, 马弢, 杨屹, 李建伟, 张艳婷, 畅翔. 动态γ辐射场中的气溶胶监测系统优化设计[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(4): 287-294.
[12]	李周, 李鹏翔, 杨海兰, 马旭媛, 林海鹏, 高泽全, 韩玉虎, 任晓娜. 用UTEVA树脂分离铀-α谱仪测量铀同位素的分析方法[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(2): 119-123.
[13]	谭伟洋, 朱晓翔, 王鹏, 张永涛, 刘颖, 龚春慧, 杨毅. 江苏省城市放废库辐射环境监测水平研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(2): 124-130.
[14]	王哲, 朱建林, 张怀胜, 张春艳, 李栋. 赣杭构造带某铀矿区地下水中铀的存在形式研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2022, 42(1): 19-23.
[15]	田雷, 陈文强. 核电站主控室内漏率试验案例研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2021, 41(6): 503-507.