确定环境保护风险基准的方法

辐射防护 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 333-338.

确定环境保护风险基准的方法

张红见¹, 姜丽丽², 张黎辉¹, 汪世军¹

1.环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京 100082;
2.中核四O四有限公司,甘肃嘉峪关 732850

收稿日期:2014-12-11 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2024-10-22
作者简介:张红见(1974—),男,1997年毕业于郑州大学化学化工学院,2011年毕业于中国原子能科学研究院辐射防护与环境保护专业,获博士学位,副研究员。E-mail: zhanghj102413@163.com
基金资助:
GB 9133修订科研(课题编号:环保标准201301)。

Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection

Zhang Hongjian, Jiang Lili, Zhang Lihui, Wang Shijun

Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, MEP, Beijing 100082;The 404 Company Limited, Gansu Jia Yuguan 732850

Received:2014-12-11 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2024-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于常规化学污染物和辐射危害缺失统一的环境风险基准,文章提出了“超额癌症风险”作为化学物质和电离辐射环境影响的评价终点,从而可以实现两类污染评价结果的比较和影响程度的叠加。研究利用目前普遍采用的统计学或流行病学调查方法、背景风险基准方法、管理决策方法,对环境保护中常规化学污染物和辐射危害环境风险基准的确定方法进行分析和筛选,推荐了超额癌症风险的环境风险基准确定方法。

关键词: 风险基准, 可接受风险水平, 评价终点, 风险系数

Abstract: "Excess cancer risk" can be used as environmental impact assessment endpoint for chemicals and ionizing radiation, thus the two environmental impact assessment results can be compared to each other and added up. After the same assessment endpoint determined, the determination methods of the risk criterion currently used are summarized, and the practicability and limitations of these various methods are analyzed. Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection of site remediation is finally recommended.

Key words: risk criterion, acceptable risk level, assessment endpoint, risk coefficient

张红见, 姜丽丽, 张黎辉, 汪世军. 确定环境保护风险基准的方法[J]. 辐射防护, 2015, 35(6): 333-338.

Zhang Hongjian, Jiang Lili, Zhang Lihui, Wang Shijun. Determination method of risk criterion for environmental protection[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2015, 35(6): 333-338.

参考文献

[1] NCRP. Risk-based classification of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes[R]. NCRP Reports No.139. Bethesda, Maryland, Issued 31 December 2002:39-41.
[2] 张红见.基于健康风险的城市固体废物填埋场放射性接收标准的研究[D].北京:中国原子能科学研究院, 2011:45-46.
[3] Renn, Ortwin. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world[M]. London: Earthscan, 2008:1-11.
[4] 潘自强. 公众健康危险评价[M ]. 北京:原子能出版社, 1994: 15.
[5] Anthony Andrews. Radioactive waste streams:waste classification for disposal[R]. Order Code RL32163. Washington: Congressinal Research Service, 2006:1-35.
[6] World Health Organization (WHO). Water quality: guidelines, standards and health[M]. London: IWA Publishing, 2001:207-228.
[7] Cotruvo JA. Drinking water standards and risk assessment[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1988, 8(3): 288-299.
[8] WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality[R]. Volume 1. Recommendations. World Health Organization, Geneva,1993.
[9] 胡二邦. 环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M]. 第二版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2004:2-9.
[10] 陆华. 危险废物填埋场地下水污染的健康风险评估[J]. 化学世界, 2014, 55(6): 338-340.
[11] 国际放射防护委员会. 国际放射防护委员会2007年建议书[M]. 国际放射防护委员会第103号出版物. 潘自强, 等译. 北京. 原子能出版社, 2007.
[12] IAEA. Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance[R]. Safety Standards Series. No. RS-G-1.7. Vienna, 2004.
[13] UNSCEAR. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation[R]. 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations Sales Publication E.00.IX.3. United Nations, New York, 2000:5.
[14] 潘自强, 刘森林. 中国辐射效应[M]. 北京:原子能出版社,2010:2.
[15] Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, et al. Acceptable risk[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[16] Mark Malander. Selection of carcinogenic target risk levels for soil and groundwater remediation[EB/OL]. [2010-01-30]. http://www.epa.gov/oust/rbdm/sctrlsgw.htm.
[17] US EPA. National oil and hazardous substances pollution contingency plan-final rule[R]. Federal Register 55: CFR Part 300:666. 1990.
[18] US EPA. Role of the baseline risk assessment in superfund remedy selection decisions[R/OL]. OSWER Directive 1991. 9355.0-30. [2010-1-30]. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessm-ent/baseline.htm.
[19] USEPA. Clean air act. 42 USC 7412(f)[R]. 1990.
[20] 环境保护部环境工程评估中心. 环境影响评价案例分析[M]. 第7版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社2014: 1-450.
[21] Yang H. Some considerations for comparing risk of radiation and chemicals[C/OL]//the Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association. Hiroshima : IRPA, May 14-19 2000[2012-11-10]. http://www2000.irpa.net/irpa10/cdrom/00509.pdf.
[22] International Agency of Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans[M]. Vol.92.//Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures. World Health Organization, Lyon, France, 2010:12-14.