医院级CT辐射剂量及诊断剂量水平研究

辐射防护 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 517-521.

医院级CT辐射剂量及诊断剂量水平研究

王亮, 彭勇, 刘怡, 彭红芬

武汉市第一医院武汉市中西医结合医院医学影像科,湖北武汉 430022

收稿日期:2019-03-04 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2020-05-15
作者简介:王亮(1988 —),男,2012年毕业于徐州医学院生物医学工程专业,获学士学位, 2015年毕业于北京协和医学院生物医学工程专业,获硕士学位,主管技师。E-mail:wangliang2012ss@163.com

Research on hospital-level CT radiation dose and diagnostic dose level

WANG Liang, PENG Yong, LIU Yi, PENG Hongfen

Department of Radiology, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Wuhan Hospital of TraditionalChinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan 430022

Received:2019-03-04 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2020-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨医院级各部位CT扫描辐射剂量及成人CT检查诊断剂量水平。采集2018年2月—2019年1月本院在GE Light Speed 16 CT设备上进行诊断性CT检查的全部成年人共15 440例的CT检查数据,按照检查部位进行分类,统计各部位的容积剂量指数(CTDI_vol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)。使用SPSS 19统计软件分析CTDI_vol、DLP的四分位数并计算有效剂量(ED)。结果表明,各部位CTDI_vol的诊断剂量参考水平(DRL)值为:颅脑87.75 mGy、肺部8.09 mGy、上下腹15.82 mGy、上下腹盆腔15.79 mGy;各部位DLP的诊断剂量参考水平(DRL)值为:颅脑1 053.03 mGy·cm、肺部245.19 mGy·cm、上下腹269.96 mGy·cm、上下腹盆腔835.20 mGy·cm。研究中发现肺部CTDI_vol、DLP的DRL值(分别为8.09 mGy、245.19 mGy·cm)低于我国其他地区和其他国家的DRL值;60岁以下患者肺部CT检查CTDI_vol、DLP的DRL值低于8.09 mGy、245.19 mGy·cm,60岁以上患者肺部CT检查CTDI_vol、DLP的DRL值高于8.09 mGy、245.19 mGy·cm。通过研究可以确定医院级各部位CT检查辐射剂量及成人CT检查诊断剂量水平,能为优化CT检查扫描技术和监测辐射剂量提供基础。

关键词: 辐射剂量, X线计算机断层摄影, 剂量优化, 诊断剂量水平

Abstract: This work aims to study the CT scan radiation dose of the human anatomical region of hospital scale and diagnostic dose level of adult CT examination. A total of 15,440 CT scan data were collected from the anatomical regions of all adults who underwent diagnostic CT examinations on GE Light Speed 16 CT equipment from February 2018 to January 2019. The volumetric dose index (CTDI_vol) and the dose length product (DLP) of the patient’s anatomical region were counted according to the anatomical region classification. The quantities of CTDI_vol and DLP in the scan data were statistically analyzed using spss19 software and the effective dose (ED) was calculated. As a result, the DRL values of CTDI_vol in each anatomical region were as follows: 87.75 mGy for the brain, 8.09 mGy for the lungs, 15.82 mGy for the upper and lower abdomen, and 15.79 mGy for the upper and lower abdominal pelvis. The DRL values of DLP in each anatomical region were as follows: for the brain was 1 053.03 mGy cm, for the lung was 245.19 mGy cm, for the upper and lower abdomen was 269.96 mGy cm, for the upper and lower abdominal pelvic was 835.20 mGy cm. The DRL values of CTDI_vol and DLP in lung anatomical region (8.09 mGy, 245.19 mGy cm) were lower than those in other regions of China and other countries. The DRL values of CTDI_vol and DLP in patients under 60 year old were lower than 8.09 mGy and 245.19 mGy cm, and the DRL values of CTDI_vol and DLP in CT scan of patients over 60 year old were higher than 8.09 mGy and 245.19 mGy cm. Taking all together, according to the analysis of the research results, the CT radiation dose and the adult CT examination dose level of each anatomical area of the hospital can be determined, which provides a basis for optimizing the CT scanning technique and monitoring the radiation dose.

Key words: radiation dose, X-ray computed tomography, dose optimization, diagnostic dose level

中图分类号:

R144.1

王亮, 彭勇, 刘怡, 彭红芬. 医院级CT辐射剂量及诊断剂量水平研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(6): 517-521.

WANG Liang, PENG Yong, LIU Yi, PENG Hongfen. Research on hospital-level CT radiation dose and diagnostic dose level[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2019, 39(6): 517-521.

参考文献 15

[1]	Koyama T, Zamami Y, Ohshima A, et al. Patterns of CT use in Japan, 2014: A nationwide cross-sectional study [J]. Eur J Radio, 2017, 97: 96-100.
[2]	Zewdu M, Kadir E, Berhane M. Assessment of pediatrics radiation dose from routine X-ray examination at Jimma University Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia [J]. Ethio J Health Sci, 2017, 27(5): 481-490.
[3]	ICRP. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT)[R]. ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP, 2007, 37(1): 1-79.
[4]	ICRP. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging [R]. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP, 2017, 46(1): 1-144.
[5]	中华医学会放射学分会质量管理与安全管理学组. CT辐射剂量诊断参考水平专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(11): 817-822.Division of Quality Management and Safety Management, Radiology Society, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on diagnostic reference level of CT radiation dose [J].Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2017, 51(11): 817-822.
[6]	ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection [R]. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007, 37(2): 1-332.
[7]	牛延涛, 张永县, 康天良, 等. 成年人CT扫描中辐射剂量和诊断参考水平的探讨[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2016, 36(11): 862-867.NIU Yantao, ZHANG Yongxian, KANG Tianliang, et al. Investigation of radiation dose and diagnostic reference levels in CT scanning for adult patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2016, 36(11): 862-867.
[8]	Ekpo E U, Adejoh T, Akwo J D, et al. Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey [J]. J Radiol Prot, 2018, 38(2): 525-535.
[9]	李士骏. 辐射事故中确定性健康危害的剂量学评价方法(I)[J]. 辐射防护, 2006, 26(1): 12-16,23.LI Shijun. Dosimetric assessment of deterministic health hazards used in radiation accident(I)[J]. Radiation Protection, 2006, 26(1): 12-16,23.
[10]	周永增. 辐射防护的生物学基础 [J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2006, 26(4): 1-7.ZHOU Yongzheng. Biological basis of radiation protection [J]. Radiation Protection Bulletin, 2006, 26(4): 1-7.
[11]	刘晓冬, 焦本蒸, 刘杉珊,等. 低剂量辐射效应及辐射的表观遗传学调控 [J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2009, 29(5): 41-49.LIU Xiaodong, JIAO Benzheng, LIU Shanshan, et al. Low dose radiation responses and epigenetics regulation [J]. Radiation Protection Bulletin, 2009, 29(5): 41-49.
[12]	左雅慧, 党旭红. 电离辐射诱发的非靶效应及其生物学意义[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2010, 30(4): 18-22.ZUO Yahui, DANG Xuhong. Potential biological implications of ionizing radiation induced non-targeted effects [J]. Radiation Protection Bulletin, 2010, 30(4): 18-22.
[13]	ICRP. ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context [R]. ICRP Publication 118. Ann ICRP, 2012, 41(1-2): 1-322.
[14]	高宇, 王平, 韩林, 等. 放射工作人员染色体畸变研究现状[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2018, 38(8): 635-640.GAO Yu, WANG Ping, HAN Lin, et al. The current research status on chromosomal aberrations of radiation workers [J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2018, 38(8): 635-640.
[15]	Greffier, J, Larbi A, Macri F, et al. Effect of patient size, anatomical location and modulation strength on dose delivered and image quality on CT examination [J]. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2017, 177(4): 373-381.