辐射防护通讯 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4-5): 60-67.

• 国际比较 • 上一篇    下一篇

核与辐射事件医学应急管理体系国际比较

曹溪园1, 曹毅1, 刘玉龙2   

  1. 1.苏州大学医学部公共卫生学院,江苏 苏州, 215123;
    2.核工业总医院,江苏 苏州, 215004
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-25 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘玉龙,yulongliu2002@126.com
  • 作者简介:曹溪园(1997—),女,2019年毕业于中国药科大学国际经济与贸易专业,学士;苏州大学预防医学专业硕士研究生在读,研究方向为核应急医学管理体系的国际比较。caoxiyuan1997@126.com

International Comparison of Medical Emergency Management Systems for Nuclear and Radiation Accidents

Cao Xiyuan1, Cao Yi1, Liu Yulong2   

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215123;
    2. General Hospital of Nuclear Industry, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004
  • Received:2020-08-25 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2021-01-15

摘要: 介绍了我国核与辐射事件医学应急管理体系的构成,并将之与日本、美国、法国、俄罗斯和加拿大的核与辐射事件医学应急管理体系进行比较,分析其优缺点,同时介绍了WHO和IAEA在核与辐射事件医学应急中的作用,在此基础上提出建立健全我国核与辐射应急医学管理体系、提升医学应急救援能力的建议。

关键词: 核事故, 辐射事故, 医学应急, 国际比较

Abstract: With the rapid development of nuclear energy and nuclear technology application in China, the medical emergency pressure is increasing along with the risk of nuclear and radiation accidents. The constitution of medical emergency management system for nuclear and radiation accidents in China is introduced. We also compare it with those of countries such as Japan, the United States, France, Russia and Canada, and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. At the same time, we review the role of WHO and IAEA in medical emergency response to nuclear and radiation accidents. We then put forward some suggestions on improving the medical emergency management system and enhancing the medical emergency response ability.

Key words: Nuclear accident, Radiation accident, Medical emergency, International comparison

中图分类号: 

  • TL73