磁共振成像(MRI)集成诊疗设备屏蔽技术分析

Abstract

Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a pivotal technology in modern medical diagnostics, renowned for its high resolution and excellent contrast of soft tissues. In recent years, the integration of MRI technology with other diagnostic and therapeutic devices, such as Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), Electrocardiography (ECG), Electroencephalography (EEG), and radiation therapy equipment like linear accelerators and proton therapy accelerators, has significantly enhanced the precision and efficiency of diagnostics and treatments. This paper discusses the shielding design and requirements for these integrated technologies, including technical aspects of magnetic and radiation shielding, as well as methodological approaches for both the equipment’s own shielding and the shielding of the room environment. This paper also introduces the shielding requirements and influencing factors for the integrated equipment itself, and also proposes that the shielding technology for integrated equipment is not a simple “1+1” model of magnetic shielding plus radiation shielding, but rather some certain synergistic effect involved.

Key words: integrated technologies, MRI, shield design, diagnostic devices

CLC Number:

R143

WANG Xiaowa. Analysis of MRI integrated diagnostic and therapeutic equipment shielding technology[J].RADIATION PROTECTION, 2025, 45(3): 292-298.

References

[1] Bogdanovic B, Solari E L, Villagran Asiares A, et al. PET/Mr technology: advancement and challenges[J]. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 2022, 52(3): 340-355.
[2] Zaidi H, Del Guerra A. An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems[J]. Medical Physics, 2011, 38(10): 5667-5689.
[3] Vandenberghe S, Marsden P K. PET-MRI:A review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging[J]. Physics in Medicine&Biology, 2015, 60(4): 115-154.
[4] Rammohan N, Randall J W, Yadav P. History of technological advancements towards MR-Linac:The future of image-guided radiotherapy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 11(16): 4730.
[5] Chin S, Eccles C L, McWilliam A, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy: A review[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 2020, 64(1): 163-177.
[6] Raaymakers B W, Raaijmakers A J E, Lagendijk J J W. Feasibility of MRI guided proton therapy: Magnetic field dose effects[J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2008, 53(20): 5615-5622.
[7] Oborn B M, Dowdell S, Metcalfe P E, et al. Future of medical physics: Real-time MRI-guided proton therapy[J]. Medical Physics, 2017, 44(8): e77-e90.
[8] PENG Bj, Walton J H, Cherry S R, et al. Studies of the interactions of an MRI system with the shielding in a combined PET/MRI scanner[J]. Physics in Medicine&Biology, 2010, 55(1): 265-280.
[9] BIAN Wanyu, LI Panfeng, ZHENG Mengyao, et al. A review of electromagnetic elimination methods for Low-Field portable MRI scanner[C]//2024 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA):IEEE, 2024: 614-618.
[10] Ishiyama A, Hondoh M, Ishida N, et al. Optimal design of MRI magnets with magnetic shielding[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1989, 25(2): 1885-1888.
[11] YANG R, ZHENG J, WANG Y, et al. An absorbing radio frequency shield to reduce RF heating induced by deep brain stimulator during 1.5-T MRI[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2019, 61(6): 1726-1732.
[12] Gross-Weege N, Dey T, Gebhardt P, et al. Characterization methods for comprehensive evaluations of shielding materials used in an MRI[J]. Medical Physics, 2018, 45(4): 1415-1424.
[13] Ahn C B, Cho Z H. Analysis of the eddy-current induced artifacts and the temporal compensation in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1991, 10(1): 47-52.
[14] Jezzard P, Barnett A S, Pierpaoli C. Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1998, 39(5): 801-812.
[15] Wilm B J, Barmet C, Pavan M, et al. Higher order reconstruction for MRI in the presence of spatiotemporal field perturbations[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2011, 65(6): 1690-1701.
[16] Truhn D, Kiessling F, Schulz V. Optimized RF shielding techniques for simultaneous PET/Mr[J]. Medical Physics, 2011, 38(7): 3995-4000.
[17] Fahy S. Electromagnetic screening by metals[J]. American Journal of Physics, 1988, 56(11): 989-992.
[18] Berneking A, Trinchero R, HA Y, et al. Design and characterization of a gradient-transparent RF copper shield for PET detector modules in hybrid MR-PET imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2017, 64(5): 1118-1127.
[19] KANG J, Choi Y, HONG K J, et al. Characterization of cross-compatibility of small animal insertable PET and MRI[C]//Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record(NSS/MIC).IEEE, 2009: 3816-3821.
[20] Judenhofer M S, Wehrl H F, Newport D F, et al. Simultaneous PET-MRI: A new approach for functional and morphological imaging[J]. Nature Medicine, 2008, 14(4): 459-465.
[21] Lee B J, Watkins R D, CHANG Cm, et al. Low eddy current RF shielding enclosure designs for 3T Mr applications[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2018, 79(3): 1745-1752.
[22] Keith J M, Janda N B, King J A, et al. Shielding effectiveness density theory for carbon fiber/nylon 6,6 composites[J]. Polymer Composites, 2005, 26(5): 671-678.
[23] Heiser J A, King J A, Konell J P, et al. Shielding effectiveness of carbon-filled nylon 6,6[J]. Polymer Composites, 2004, 25(4): 407-416.
[24] Düppenbecker P M, Wehner J, Renz W, et al. Gradient transparent RF housing for simultaneous PET/MRI using carbon fiber composites[C]//2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC):IEEE, 2012: 3478-3480.
[25] PENG Boj, WU Yibao, Cherry S R, et al. New shielding configurations for a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner at 7T[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2014, 239: 50-56.
[26] Weissler B, Gebhardt P, Dueppenbecker P M, et al. A digital preclinical PET/MRI insert and initial results[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2015, 34(11): 2258-2270.
[27] Weissler B, Gebhardt P, Lerche C W, et al. Mr compatibility aspects of a silicon photomultiplier-based PET/RF insert with integrated digitisation[J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2014, 59(17): 5119-5139.
[28] Weissler B. Digital PET/MRI for preclinical applications[D].PhD thesis,Dissertation,RWTH Aachen, 2016.
[29] Yoon H S, Ko G B, Kwon S I, et al. Initial results of simultaneous PET/MRI experiments with an MRI-compatible silicon photomultiplier PET scanner[J]. Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2012, 53(4): 608-614.
[30] Hamamura M J, HA S, Roeck W W, et al. Development of an MR-compatible SPECT system(MRSPECT)for simultaneous data acquisition[J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2010, 55(6): 1563-1575.
[31] Jehenson P, Westphal M, Schuff N. Analytical method for the compensation of eddy-current effects induced by pulsed magnetic field gradients in NMR systems[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 1990, 90(2): 264-278.
[32] Favazza C P, King D M, Edmonson H A, et al. Use of a radio frequency shield during 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging:experimental evaluation[J]. Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014, 7: 363-370.
[33] Chang, Qiru, GUO Shaoyun, ZHANG X L,et al. Radiation shielding polymer composites:Ray-interaction mechanism,structural design,manufacture and biomedical applications[J]. Materials&Design, 2023, 233(9): 112253.
[34] CHEN Zhenping, ZHANG Zhenyu, XIE Jinsen, et al. Multi-objective optimization strategies for radiation shielding design with genetic algorithm[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2021, 260: 107267.
[35] Okafor, Emeka C, Okonkwo U C, et al. Trends in reinforced composite design for ionizing radiation shielding applications:a review[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56: 11631-11655.
[36] More C V, Alsayed Z, Badawi M S, et al. Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: A review[J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19(3): 2057-2090.
[37] Bijanu A, Arya R, Agrawal V, et al. Metal-polymer composites for radiation protection: A review[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2021, 28(10): 392.
[38] YANG K, CHEN H, HAN Z, et al. Bio-inspired multifunctional high-performance electromagnetic shielding coatings resistant to extreme space environments[J]. The Innovation Materials, 2023, 1(1): 100010.
[39] Jinia A J,Clarke S D, Moran J M, et al. Intelligent radiation:A review of machine learning applications in nuclear and radiological sciences[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2024, 201(15): 110444.
[40] Demir E, Candan Z, YAN N, et al. Green material for radiation shielding: An Overview[M]//Emerging Nanomaterials:Opportunities and challenges in forestry sectors. Springer, Cham, 2022: 299-336.

Analysis of MRI integrated diagnostic and therapeutic equipment shielding technology

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	WANG Wenxiu, CHEN Xiaojun, YIN Min, YANG Xiuyu. Development of protective clothing for external irradiation [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2021, 41(S1): 40-44.
[2]	Yu Weiyue, Chen Faguo, Han Yi, Li Guodong, Yang Mingming. Research status on effectiveness of lead glasses for occupational protection in interventional procedures [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2017, 37(6): 507-514.
[3]	Wei Yingjing, Meng Yanjun, Ke Haipeng, Zhao Pengfei, Gu Weigang, Zhang Qingli. Performance Assessment of Gamma-ray Monitors for Radiation Protection Monitoring in China [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION, 2014, 34(3): 162-167.