辐射防护通讯 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 20-24.

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

能力验证样品中总α和总β放射性的测定

马秀凤, 张馨蕊, 杜娟, 李建杰   

  1. 北京市核与辐射安全中心,北京,100089
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2023-07-07
  • 作者简介:马秀凤(1988—),女,2011年本科毕业于聊城大学分析化学专业,2014年硕士研究生毕业于中国原子能科学研究院分析化学专业,从事辐射环境监测与评价工作,高级工程师。E-mail: imaxiufeng@sina.com

Determination of Gross α and Gross β Radioactivity in Proficiency Test Samples

Ma Xiufeng, Zhang Xinrui, Du Juan, Li Jianjie   

  1. Beijing Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Beijing, 100089
  • Received:2022-08-25 Published:2023-07-07

摘要: 为提高低水平放射性测量水平,以保证监测数据的准确性和可靠性,参加了2021年中国辐射防护研究院组织的能力验证活动。厚源法分别以241Am粉末、90Sr/90Y粉末为标准源,测定水样、气溶胶中总α和总β放射性。相对比较法分别以241Am标准溶液、90Sr/90Y标准溶液为标准源,测定水样中总α和总β放射性。结果表明,厚源法测量结果的相对偏差和Z值分别在4.2%~18.8%、-0.42~0.95;相对比较法测量结果的相对偏差和Z值分别在3.7%~14.4%、-0.13~0.72。评定结果全部为“满意”。

关键词: 能力验证, 总α和总β放射性, 厚源法, 相对比较法

Abstract: To improve the measurement efficiency of low-level radioactivity and to ensure the accuracy and reliability of monitoring data, the authors participated in the proficiency test organized by China Institute for Radiation Protection in 2021. Thick source method with 241Am powder and 90Sr/90Y powder as standard sources was used for determination of gross α and gross β radioactivity in water and aerosol samples. Relative comparison method with 241Am solution and 90Sr/90Y solution as standard sources was used for the determination of gross α and gross β radioactivity in water samples. Results showed that the relative deviation and Z-score of thick source method were 4.2%-18.8% and -0.42 to 0.95, respectively; while the values of relative comparison method were 3.7%-14.4% and -0.13 to 0.72, respectively. The evaluation result was “satisfactory” for both methods. The quality assurance and quality control of low-level α/β radioactivity measurement system in our laboratory are satisfactory and effective. The radioactivity measurement methods and data processing methods are reliable.

Key words: Proficiency test, Gross α and β radioactivity, Thick source, Relative comparison

中图分类号: 

  • X830.5