核电厂操纵员心理干预与一般心理咨询的异同

辐射防护通讯 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 31-35.

核电厂操纵员心理干预与一般心理咨询的异同

吴震卿¹, 李敏², 刘玉龙³

1.苏州卫生职业技术学院,江苏苏州, 215009;
2.苏州艾丁心理咨询服务有限公司,江苏苏州, 215007;
3.苏州大学附属第二医院,江苏苏州, 215004

收稿日期:2019-03-31 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2021-01-15
通讯作者: 刘玉龙,E-mail:yulongliu2002@suda.edu.cn
作者简介:吴震卿(1983—),男,南京医科大学精神病与精神卫生学硕士研究生,精神科主治医师、心理治疗师、讲师;研究方向:精神病学、临床心理学。E-mail:wzhq@szhct.edu.cn

Similarities and Differences between Psychological Intervention of Nuclear Power Plant Operators and General Psychological Counseling

Wu Zhenqing¹, Li Min², Liu Yulong³

1. Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215009;
2. Suzhou Aiding Psychological Consulting Service Co. Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215007;
3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004

Received:2019-03-31 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2021-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解核电厂操纵员心理干预工作与一般人群心理干预的异同,将研究对象初次心理访谈报告及功能大体评定(GAF)量表结果全部纳入研究范围,由一名资深动力学取向心理咨询师从报告中提取被访谈者或来访者初次访谈时对访谈性质的理解与期待、本人自我功能与力量、主要困难的性质和内容的信息录入数据库,社会功能水平采用GAF量表来评定,分为操纵员组和来访者组进行统计分析。结果表明,两组在对访谈性质的理解与期待、本人自我功能与力量、主要困难的性质和内容及社会功能水平方面均存在显著差异。操纵员心理访谈工作与常规心理咨询工作的侧重点不同,参与心理访谈的操纵员对访谈的目标有清晰、准确的预估,对心理访谈性质的理解与期待的差异,深刻地影响着心理访谈工作,一定程度上制约了操纵员更合理、有效地使用临床心理资源。建立劳动保障—科普宣教—专业心理援助资源三位一体的科学、完善的心理健康支持系统更有利于操纵员群体的心理健康。

关键词: 核电厂, 主控室操纵员, 心理干预, 一般心理咨询

Abstract: Through the analysis of the research subjects' initial psychological interview report and the results of the General Assessment of Function (GAF) scale, it is found that there were significant differences betweenoperators and the general populationin the understanding and expectation of the nature of the interview, self-function and strength, the nature and content of the main difficulties, and the level of socipopulation. The operators participating in the psychological interview have a clear and accurate estimation of the interview goal. The difference in understanding and expectation of the nature of the psychological interview has a profound impact on the psychological interview work, to a certain extent, restricts operators from using clinical psychological resources more reasonably and effectively. The establishment of a scientific and complete mental health support system of labor security-science education-professional psychological assistance resources is more conducive to the mental health of the operator group.

Key words: Nuclear power plant, Operator, Psychological intervention, General psychological counseling

中图分类号:

R395

吴震卿, 李敏, 刘玉龙. 核电厂操纵员心理干预与一般心理咨询的异同[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2020, 40(3): 31-35.

Wu Zhenqing, Li Min, Liu Yulong. Similarities and Differences between Psychological Intervention of Nuclear Power Plant Operators and General Psychological Counseling[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION BULLETIN, 2020, 40(3): 31-35.

[1]	雷强, 刘哲, 蒋婧, 何玮, 徐琛, 郑国文. 核电厂放射性固体废物桶外γ测量重要影响因素的探讨[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2020, 40(3): 9-14.
[2]	李静, 陈利刚. 某核电厂厂区辐射监测系统监测数据异常波动原因分析[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2020, 40(2): 27-31.
[3]	朱元理, 张志强, 马来山. 压水堆核电厂辐射工作分级标准优化改进及应用[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2020, 40(2): 32-34.
[4]	徐明华, 金卫阳, 戴生迁, 周铁男, 龚蕾. 福清核电2014—2018年职业照射剂量分析[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2019, 39(4): 1-4.
[5]	周铁男, 谢文瑾, 徐明华, 龚蕾, 戴生迁, 王力. 某核电厂2018年度个人剂量监测[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2019, 39(4): 33-36.
[6]	邓才远, 罗刚. 核电厂放射性废物治理现状及面临的主要问题[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2018, 38(6): 11-16.
[7]	毛远意, 陈宇. 核电厂液态流出物排放数模计算域分析[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2018, 38(4): 27-32.
[8]	吕阳, 徐洋洋, 吕杰帅, 康凯强, 马途途. 核电厂通风系统高效过滤器现场检测方法改进[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2018, 38(3): 21-23.
[9]	陈五星, 张多飞, 吴荣俊, 贾靖轩, 邹涛, 李文博. 第三代压水堆核电站厂房辐射监测系统比较[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2018, 38(3): 12-16.
[10]	梁彦杰. 核电厂辐射监测系统总体结构优化过程及改进方案[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2018, 38(2): 26-30.