中美核燃料循环设施核事故应急状态分级对比与探讨

辐射防护通讯 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 12-16.

中美核燃料循环设施核事故应急状态分级对比与探讨

崔浩, 陈鹏, 李冰, 杨端节

生态环境部核与辐射安全中心,北京 102401

收稿日期:2023-05-22 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-14
作者简介:崔浩(1989—),男,2012年毕业于哈尔滨工业大学核物理专业,高级工程师。E-mail:cuihao@chinansc.cn
基金资助:
后处理设施安全审评若干关键技术研究。

Comparison and discussion of emergency classification on nuclear accident of nuclear fuel cycle facilities in China and USA

CUI Hao, CHEN Peng, LI Bing, YANG Duanjie

Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of MEE, Beijing 102401

Received:2023-05-22 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文介绍了美国核管会(NRC)及中国核燃料循环设施应急状态分级发展的历史及现状,对比了中美核燃料循环设施应急状态分级的差异,并给出分析结果,建议对后处理设施开展完整的二级PSA研究,给出相关事故谱,为进行应急状态分级及应急行动水平制定提供充分的技术支撑。

关键词: 核燃料循环设施, 应急行动水平, 应急状态分级, 乏燃料后处理设施

Abstract: The emergency action level of nuclear fuel cycle facilities is one of the grading criteria for the emergency status of nuclear fuel cycle facilities. The grading of emergency status is also an important basis for formulating the level of emergency operations. This paper introduces the history and current situation of the development of emergency classification of nuclear fuel cycle facilities in the U.S. NRC and China. This paper also compares the differences in the emergency status classification of nuclear fuel cycle facilities between China and the United States NRC. Finally, analysis results are discussed. It is recommended to conduct a complete secondary PSA study, to provide accident spectrum, and to provide sufficient technical support for the development of emergency status classification and emergency action level.

Key words: Nuclear fuel cycle facility, emergency action level, emergency classification, spent fuel reprocessing facilities

中图分类号:

TL73

崔浩, 陈鹏, 李冰, 杨端节. 中美核燃料循环设施核事故应急状态分级对比与探讨[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2024, 44(1): 12-16.

CUI Hao, CHEN Peng, LI Bing, YANG Duanjie. Comparison and discussion of emergency classification on nuclear accident of nuclear fuel cycle facilities in China and USA[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION BULLETIN, 2024, 44(1): 12-16.