世界核电史三次严重事故的反思

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 1979年美国三哩岛核事故、1986年前苏联切尔诺贝利核事故和2011年日本福岛核事故是世界核电发展史上三次严重核事故。前事不忘,后事之师。从核事故中总结吸取经验和教训,有利于进一步加强核安全,更好地发展和利用核能为民造福。

关键词: 核事故, 核电站, 核安全, 安全文化, 核应急

Abstract: In the history of world nuclear powerdevelopment three catastrophic nuclear accidents unfolded, i.e., the Three MileIsland nuclear accident (USA, 1979), the Chernobyl nuclear accident (former Soviet Union, 1986) and the Fukushima nuclear accident(Japan, 2011). As we look to the future, we can learn from our past, lessons and beneficial inspirations mustbe learned from these accidents. This will accordingly strengthen the nuclear safety, so as to benefit the people via nuclear power development.

Key words: Nuclear accident, Nuclear power plants, Nuclear safety, Safety culture, Nuclear emergency

中图分类号:

TL73

郑钧正. 世界核电史三次严重事故的反思[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2016, 36(3): 1-9.

Zheng Junzheng. Reflection of Three Catastrophic Accidents in the History of World Nuclear Power Development[J]. RADIATION PROTECTION BULLETIN, 2016, 36(3): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] IAEA, OECD/NEA. The International Nuclear and RadiologicalEvent Scale User's Manual(2008 Edition)[M]. Vienna:IAEA, 2009.
[2] 邹正宇, 苏鲁明编译. 三哩岛事故和切尔诺贝利事故[M]. 北京:原子能出版社, 2008.
[3] 潘自强, 等. 核与辐射事故(事件)中的社会响应问题[M]. 北京:中国原子能出版社, 2011.
[4] International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. The ChernobylAccident:Updating of INSAG-1, Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-7[M]. Vienna:IAEA, 1992.
[5] WHO, IAEA, UNDP. Chernobyl:the True Scale of the Accident—20 Years Later a UN Report Provides Definitive Answers and Ways to Repair Lives [EB/OL]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr38/en/.
[6] 新华社联合国4月26日电(记者倪红梅, 顾震球). 联合国纪念切尔诺贝利核事故30周年 [OL]. [2016-04-26]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/.
[7] UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 1988 Report, Sources, Effects and Risks ofIonizing Radiation[M]. New York:UN, 1988.
[8] UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2000 Report, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation[M]. New York:UN, 2000.
[9] UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. Ⅱ:Annex D Health Effects due to Radiation from the ChernobylAccident [M]. New York: UN, 2011.
[10] UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2013 Report, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. I [M]. New York:UN, 2014.
[11] UNSCEAR. Developments since the 2013 UNSCEAR Report on the Levelsand Effects of Radiation Exposure due to the Nuclear Accident Following the Great East-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami[M]. New York:UN, 2015.
[12] 伍浩松, 王海丹. 日本国会福岛核事故独立调查委员会公布福岛核事故正式调查报告[J]. 国外核新闻, 2012,(7):24.
[13] 沈红辉, 刘秀玲. 日本东电3名前高管因福岛核事故被强制起诉[OL]. [2016-02-29]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/tech/2016-02/29/c_1118188876.htm.
[14] 刘石磊, 杨骏. 日本应正视“福岛之问”[OL]. [2016-05-23]. http://www.chinanews.com.
[15] 王亦楠. 我为什么不赞成重启内陆核电——我国核电发展必须稳中求进、确保安全[J]. 中国经济周刊, 2014,(30):16.
[16] 卫生部卫生法制与监督司公安部三局. 全国放射事故案例汇编[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2001.
[17] IAEA. Safety Culture, IAEA Safety Series No.75-INSAG-4[M]. Vienna:IAEA, 1991.
[18] IAEA. Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency[M]. IAEA Safety Requirements, Safety Standards Series No.GS-R-2. Vienna:IAEA, 2002.
[19] 郑钧正. 应对日本福岛核事故公众宣传中必须厘清的20个问题[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2011,28(4):189.
[20] 姚家祥. 切尔诺贝利核事故中各国的辐射防护和后果评价[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 1987,7(6):440.
[21] 何祚庥. 科学发展核能必须“稳中求进”——兼与杜祥琬院士商榷[N].中国能源报, 2012-06-20.
[22] 赵春国. 海恩法则和墨菲定律[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2009,9(1):51.
[23] 张栋. 世界核电发展及对我国的启示[J]. 能源技术经济, 2010,22(12):5.
[24] 张立晖. 国内外核电发展现状与核电技术对比分析[J]. 中国科技博览, 2014(31):342.
[25] 伍浩松, 张焰. 2014年全球核电装机容量小幅回升[J]. 国外核新闻, 2015(3):12.
[26] 汤紫德. 核电规划要“瞻前顾后”,要同步关注核燃料循环[J]. 核电, 2015,(6):1.
[27] 文汇报网. 中国在建核电机组数量世界第一[OL]. [2016-02-13]. http://news.wenweipo.com.
[28] 中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院通过《核电安全规划》和《核电中长期发展规划》[N]. 经济参考报, 2012-10-25.
[29] 陈竹舟, 施仲齐, 等. 《国家核应急预案》解读[M]. 北京:中国原子能出版社, 2014.
[30] 新华网(海牙3月24日电). 习近平主席在荷兰海牙核安全峰会上的讲话(全文)[OL]. [2014-03-25]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-03/25/c_126310117.htm.